November 26, 2012
Angela D Shinn, Community Manager
Superior Community Management
P. O. Box 4585
Tualatin, Ore. 97062-9997
RE: 2013 Budget letter and enclosed declaration
Dear Mrs. Angela Shinn,
First and foremost, the Board of Directors (BOD) of the Oak
Knoll Homeowners Association has no statutory authority to ask for the private
information contained within the “HOMEOWNER AND TENANT CONTACT INFORMATION AND
DECLARATION” page. It is none of the board’s business who resides within my
home, who our emergency contacts are, and/or what vehicles we own or that may
which be parked on our property. Therefore you will not receive that
information from me, and I have encouraged several other homeowners to do just
the same via Facebook and my OKHA blog, as well as in person.
Second, I see the BOD and the attorneys for the HOA
quietly agreed with my previous legal arguments about the reserve account and
required reserve study mandated by the CC&Rs, voted in by the 1999 (then)
BOD, and the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 94.595) on point. I believe this is
the third time, or maybe the fourth that I’ve provided the better legal
argument in which the BOD of the HOA (and its attorneys) have conceded to in
one form or another. Not sure, lost count over the years…anyhow, I digress.
Getting back on track, the letter also stated that the
sidewalk maintenance reminders about tree damage along Foothills will be
repaired by the HOA. What budgetary item would this repair come from, because
under ORS 94.595, only that which is a common property of the HOA shall reserve
funds be used to repair, maintain and/or replace that common property.
I will be monitoring the board meeting minutes and come
this time next year, I will be asking for a copy or appointment to review the
HOA’s expense account history for 2013; and if I find even one non-common
property being repaired, maintained or replaced via reserve account funds in
violation of ORS 94.595, we will have a problem.
Exactly what board meeting (so I may select the minutes
from the website) did the BOD approve of adding a new budgetary item – Tree
Trimming & Removal – to the annual budget? This is a self-serving budget
item in the sense that it benefits only those homeowners along Foothills Dr.
and that is a breach of the BOD fiduciary duties in ensuring fairness to all
homeowners.
In other words, this line item budget account for the
trees along Foothills was merely to circumvent ORS 94.595 and the CC&Rs
that clearly state that ALL trees of
the association are to be maintained by the HOA, not just those along Foothills Drive. Either the HOA pays for the
repair, maintenance and/or replacement of ALL the trees within the HOA as the
CC&Rs state, or none at all. Continuing the “status quo” of the BOD
ignorance from one generation of the board to the next is still a violation of the plain language of the CC&Rs and ORS
94.595 regarding common property.
Yours Truly...